Skip to content
Vestval
InsuranceMid-sized general insurer, ~1,800 handlers

Claims-handler AI copilot for a mid-sized insurer

A governed AI copilot embedded in the claims-handler workspace — drafting responses, summarising case files and flagging escalations under a strict maker-checker model.

Tools / product used · Vestval Flow + Custom AI agents

01

Challenge

Claims handlers spent most of their day stitching context across PDFs, emails and the policy admin system. Response quality varied widely…

02

Solution

A handler-side copilot built on Vestval Flow that summarises case files from retrieval over policy and claim documents, drafts response…

03

Architecture

We profiled three handler personas over two weeks, designed a copilot that drafts but never sends, and instrumented every suggestion with a…

04

Timeline

4-phase implementation · Vestval Flow + Custom AI agents

05

Impact

Average handle time reduced materially across pilot cohorts (qualitative)

Challenge

Claims handlers spent most of their day stitching context across PDFs, emails and the policy admin system. Response quality varied widely between handlers and supervisors had no leverage.

Objectives

  • Cut average handle time without eroding response quality
  • Standardise response language across handlers without making it robotic
  • Give supervisors a defensible review surface for AI-assisted decisions
  • Keep every AI output reviewable, explainable and overridable

Approach

We profiled three handler personas over two weeks, designed a copilot that drafts but never sends, and instrumented every suggestion with a reviewable trail before rolling out cohort by cohort.

Solution

A handler-side copilot built on Vestval Flow that summarises case files from retrieval over policy and claim documents, drafts response language, and routes anything with escalation signals to a supervisor queue with full reasoning visible.

Implementation approach

  1. 1

    Handler shadowing first

    Two weeks shadowing three handler personas before any UI was sketched. The copilot was designed around their real day, not the documented one.

  2. 2

    Draft-not-send by design

    Every AI output is a draft that requires a human action. No outbound communication is sent by the model. This is encoded in the workflow, not in convention.

  3. 3

    Supervisor escalation queue

    Escalation signals (regulatory keywords, vulnerable-customer markers, dispute language) are routed to a supervisor queue with the model's reasoning attached.

  4. 4

    Cohort rollout with kill-switch

    Rolled out one handler cohort at a time, with per-cohort metrics and a per-tenant kill-switch the operations lead can pull without engineering.

Technologies used

  • Vestval Flow
  • Private LLM deployment
  • Governed retrieval
  • Supervisor queue
  • Per-tenant kill-switch
  • Immutable audit log

Outcomes

  • Average handle time reduced materially across pilot cohorts (qualitative)
  • Response consistency improved without losing handler voice
  • Supervisors gained a structured review surface for the first time
  • Zero outbound AI-sent communications — every customer message saw a human

Lessons learned

  • Draft-not-send removes most of the governance debate before it starts.
  • Per-cohort rollout with a real kill-switch is what makes operations sign off.
  • The supervisor surface matters as much as the handler surface — design both.
AI AutomationInsuranceCopilotVestval FlowGovernance